PD in Practice ” The opinion or The spin? ” Why #RussiaInvadedUkraine Matters

PD in Practice ” The opinion or The  spin? ” Why #RussiaInvadedUkraine Matters

Last week, Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin, said he could take Kiev in two weeks. This week, he disavowed a cease-fire, then proposed a peace plan. Now a cease-fire is in effect. These zigzags did their job, leaving the West confused about his intentions, just as the European Union and NATO were meeting to figure

Last week, Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin, said he could take Kiev in two weeks. This week, he disavowed a cease-fire, then proposed a peace plan. Now a cease-fire is in effect. These zigzags did their job, leaving the West confused about his intentions, just as the European Union and NATO were meeting to figure out how to counter them.

In the information war, Ukrainians have been striking back. When Russian soldiers openly engaged Ukrainian forces at the end of August, a new hashtag began to trend on Twitter. Invented by a Belorussian and enthusiastically promoted by Ukrainians, #RussiaInvadedUkraine was used nearly a half a million times in the first few days. A week later, it was still being posted hundreds of times an hour.

In this conflict, technologically driven activism has become characteristic. Ukraine’s Maidan revolution began with a post on Facebook, and a “nerd unit,” staffed by volunteers who are crowdsourcing the funding for their drones, is operating in the contested east. What’s new and important about #RussiaInvadedUkraine is its clear language.

russian toys invaders

One of the features of Russia’s war against Ukraine has been the reintroduction of Newspeak into public discourse. The Kremlin has used misinformation, propaganda and outright deceit to frame the debate. Ukraine’s cyberactivists insisted on #RussiaInvadedUkraine to remind Western leaders and journalists who are loath to use such plain terms that our weak words are an unnecessary concession to Mr. Putin.

It may seem precious, when the war has already claimed at least 3,000 lives, to fuss over the proper use of language. It isn’t. George Orwell, in his famous 1946 essay, “Politics and the English Language,” argued that the battle against poor English wasn’t frivolous because “the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.”

There is a case for fudging. By calling Russia’s latest aggression against Ukraine an “incursion,” as President Obama did when Russian tanks first drove in, we could be leaving Mr. Putin an easier way out. If he never “invaded,” the logic goes, he won’t need to face the humiliation of retreat.

That might have been a reasonable theory this summer, after the destruction of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17. Russia had already invaded and annexed part of Ukraine — Crimea — and Russian citizens and Russian weapons were spearheading the insurgency in the Donbass region in the east. But it was just possible that Mr. Putin would choose to end a conflict that had already cost Russia billions of dollars.

He didn’t. Instead, as the Ukrainian military was making gains in the Donbass, Mr. Putin opted for further escalation by directly sending in Russian troops and equipment.

Mr. Putin has already muzzled Russia’s once boisterous free press, exiled and imprisoned opposition leaders and assumed direct control of the mass media. If he opts for a compromise over Ukraine — and the best scenario on offer right now seems to be an ugly and destabilizing “frozen conflict” in the Donbass — he won’t need the West to help him justify himself at home. He has a powerful domestic propaganda machine to do that.

By adopting Mr. Putin’s Newspeak we aren’t offering him a useful diplomatic fig leaf. We are convincing him of his strength and our weakness. When Russian troops fighting in Ukraine are described on Russian state television as being “on vacation,” the Kremlin is asserting not only that it can send soldiers to Ukraine, but that it can explain their presence with an aggressively transparent excuse that amounts to thuggish mockery.

 A
pro-Russian separatist standing near a damaged war memorial on a hill east of Donetsk. Credit Maxim Shemetov/Reuters

Mr.Putin is challenging us with a double bluff, one military and one rhetorical. Reasonable people can differ on how much we should be supporting Ukraine and on how strongly we should be sanctioning Russia. But it is no longer possible to disagree about what is happening.

This is not a civil war, nor is it a fascist coup. Eastern Ukrainians are not rising up against an oppressive regime in Kiev.

We don’t know whether this week’s talk of cease-fire is real or just a feint, nor do we know if Ukraine will survive as a viable, independent country. But one thing is already certain: Russia has invaded a sovereign, democratic state, and through that use of force aims to shape its actions.

We may decide we lack the will to stop this or to more forcefully help Ukrainians to stop it, but in making that decision we need to be clear about what is going on. The distinction between lies and truth matters here because this conflict started with the Ukrainian people’s revolt against authoritarianism and in favor of the liberal rights and responsibilities Ukrainians call European values. This is partly a fight of freedom of speech against censorship. In the Ukrainian-Russian conflict, moral clarity is essential, but to get there we need linguistic clarity, too: Ukrainians decided to build a democracy at home and to make a trade deal with Europe; Russia invaded.

As the Lithuanian president, Dalia Grybauskaite, put it earlier this week (on Twitter, of course), “#Ukraine is attacked because of its European choice. It is not only defending its territory, but also #Europe and its values.”

If the fighting in the Donbass was in fact a civil war, it would matter to Ukrainians, Russians, Eastern Europeans and everyone who cares about the thousands who have died. But the wider security implications would be limited. Countries do break up — the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, perhaps even the United Kingdom.

What makes the Ukrainian conflict consequential is that it is not a civil war. It is an annexation of territory, the invasion of one European country by another. As Carl Bildt, the Swedish foreign minister, argued in a speech in Berlin in June, Europe’s entire security structure is built on the agreement that this would never happen again.

“The principle of respecting existing borders was laid down as one of the key foundations of peace in our Europe,” Mr. Bildt said. “And it has been adhered to up until March of this year.”

In other words, Russia has broken Europe’s geopolitical rules, and thereby changed them.

Confronting Mr. Putin is a painful prospect, but so is living in a world governed by these new rules. Mr. Putin and his propagandists understand this very well, which is why they like to present us with the easier option of obfuscation. That’s the most dangerous choice of all. #RussiaInvadedUkraine. Please retweet.

Update: This article has been updated to reflect news developments.

Chrystia Freeland is the author of “Sale of the Century: Russia’s Wild Ride From Communism to Capitalism” and a Liberal member of the Canadian Parliament.

 

 

Please follow and like us:

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages

RSS BIDD

  • Time-off from non-existent PD 26th March 2019
    Image from I have come to the sad conclusion that "public diplomacy" has no meaning for the current White House opera obscura, if not for the American public. As you know, the USA State Department currently doesn't even have a Public Diplomacy official. So, focusing as I have on my modest blog re my beloved […]
  • Pet najboljih načina da prepoznate bota na Tviteru 25th March 2019
    Takmičenje velikog broja sistema u detekciji botova na Tviteru, koje je pokrenula Agencija za razvoj naprednih istraživačkih projekata, uspelo je da ukaže na ključne kriterijume za prepoznavanje lažnih naloga. Učesnici takmičenja opremili su svoje sisteme tako da identifikuju lažne naloge koristeći pet glavnih tačaka pri obradi podataka. Sistemi koje su dobili kao rezultat daleko su […]

RSS Diplo Portal Belgrade

  • Élections européennes 2019 26th March 2019
    Les élections européennes auront lieu à Belgrade le 26 mai 2019. - Elections / Source : La France en Serbie (https://rs.ambafrance.org) The post Élections européennes 2019 appeared first on Diplomatic portal.
  • Промоција књиге „Помоћ Руса и Русије Србима и Србији“ одржана у Руском дому 26th March 2019
    У Мермерној сали Руског дома 25. марта је одржана презентација књиге „Помоћ Руса и Русије Србима и Србији“ аутора Митра Радоњића уз подршку друштва „Русија“ из Новог Сада, чији је он члан. Поред аутора на промоцији су говорили и председник друштва сународника „Русија“ Маријана Младеновић, члан Градског одбора Новог Сада Бранко Паравиња и професор Филозофског […]

Catalog of Destroyed and Desecrated Churches in Kosovo ( VIDEO )

Most Viewed Posts

  • Twitter Suspends Hamas Accounts
    By ROBERT MACKEYLast Updated, Sunday, Jan. 19 | Several Twitter accounts used by the military wing of Hamas have been suspended by the social network in recent days, angering the Islamist militants and delighting Israel’s military. #Twitter has suspended the official account of #Hamas, a terrorist group that uses social media to threaten #Israel http://t.co/g1UxKc9fpf
  • Brain drain in Serbia today
    How does the Serbian government cope with the problem of brain drain today? The latest OECD publication, SOPEMI 2014 shows that 39 thousand persons emigrated in 2012 from Serbia to OECD countries only. (At the beginning of the global economic and financial crisis, the emigration from Serbia to OECD countries amounted to 27,000 in 2008.)

How Belgrade based diplomats use Digital Diplomacy and Internet 2016

Diplo Portal Belgrade

Please follow and like us:
Scroll Up
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)