Northeast Asia: A Public Diplomacy Vision
Oct 10, 2018
In June, CPD Director Jay Wang participated in South Korea's 2018 Jeju Forum for Peace and Prosperity, where he spoke on a panel that discussed public diplomacy across Northeast Asia.
During the event, Wang emphasized the prevalence of non-state actors as key players in public diplomacy and acknowledged that, as audiences and platforms change, there is a need to make public diplomacy more strategic.
“This is actually the moment when we are trying to figure out, what is the 21st century world order?” said Wang. “How should East Asia contribute to the developing of this new world order?”
Below please find a video featuring the panel discussion. The original video can be found on Arirang TV's YouTube channel here.
[Arirang Special] Jeju Forum – Vision of Public Diplomacy for Northeast Asia_ Full Episode
Video of [Arirang Special] Jeju Forum – Vision of Public Diplomacy for Northeast Asia_ Full Episode
Wa'el Nimat, uscpublicdiplomacy.org
uncaptioned image from article
Today, the threat and danger of violent extremism—whether foreign or domestic—is far more challenging than it has ever been. The unpredictable nature of violent extremism enables it not to be restricted to a single race, gender, religion, culture, country or even an ideology.
In the 21st century, the notion of violent extremism has expressed how volatile its adherents are in the age of information and constant worldwide integration. New interactive developments that range from the globalization of the media, to transnational developments, have allowed violent extremist ideology to become digitized and more readily available for those who seek it. To the dismay of contrary belief, differing methods for countering violent extremism (CVE) have created division within the U.S. With so much of the U.S. government’s efforts to eliminate violent extremism directed abroad, containing homegrown violent extremism (HVE) has ..
Xin Liu, uscpublicdiplomacy.org, Nov 15, 2018
uncaptioned image from article
Since China became openly engaged in projecting soft power, its endeavors have constantly faced challenges.
When China’s investment in soft power exceeds the combined government spending of the U.S., UK, France, Germany and Japan, public diplomacy [JB emphasis] starts to blur into the area of dollar diplomacy, and inducement combined with intimidation were often considered to be the “hard edge” of China’s soft power. To some, the edge has become so sharp that it is deemed to have changed the nature of soft power, as argued by Christopher Walker and Jessica Ludwig when they coined the new phrase “sharp power” in 2017 to refer to “authoritarian soft power” because it “pierces, penetrates, or perforates the political and information environments in the targeted countries” through the use of “outward-facing censorship, manipulation and distraction.” They used China and Russia as typical examples and stated that “..
This week, the Global Cyberspace Conference takes place in The Hague (16-17 April). In March, UNESCO hosted a conference on Connecting the Dots in Digital Space. The NETmundial Initiative had a meeting in Stanford recently. In early May, the Freedom Online Conference will take place in Ulan Bator (for dates and a list of eventsRead more
Recent events made the world community think about new challenges facing humanity in the 21st century, as well as ways to build a safer and prosperous world. These issues where discussed at the International Summer School “Global Challenges 2018”, which was held at the Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia. OrganizersRead more