Soft power against hard power

Soft power against hard power

Turkey is responding to manipulation attacks by the U.S. with more efficient public relations, sophisticated diplomacy and focused lobbying efforts The more cornered U.S. President Donald Trump becomes in local politics, the more aggressive he becomes to the outside world. We see this most clearly in his discourse about Turkey. President Trump says that he

Turkey is responding to manipulation attacks by the U.S. with more efficient public relations, sophisticated diplomacy and focused lobbying efforts

The more cornered U.S. President Donald Trump becomes in local politics, the more aggressive he becomes to the outside world. We see this most clearly in his discourse about Turkey.

President Trump says that he and his team have been battling Turkey for pastor Andrew Brunson’s release. At the same time, he has been running a merciless perception operation. This open call of war has caused things to turn upside down to some extent. Of course, this is partly because of Trump’s aggressive approach to many other countries in the world. This is a great chance for Turkey.

Turkey has the ground for common action and even for establishing “new alliances” with other countries, particularly Germany and France, the two largest members of the European Union, along with Russia and China.

Such a ground has emerged in the U.S. as well. In other words, something new is happening on the Western front. Despite all these negative attitudes, the U.S. media and the public, with the exception of marginal evangelical groups, do not have a positive outlook on the White House policy on Turkey about the Brunson crisis. Matt Bryza, an important figure in U.S. politics and a Turkey expert, is one of them.

Many commentators like him in U.S. media argue that these policies go against U.S. interests and that relations with Turkey must be restored. This is important as it strengthens Turkey’s hand on a global level. Of course, the current state of affairs is due to diplomatic initiatives and efforts made, as much as Turkey’s strategic significance. For instance, Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu’s recent article in USA Today has had great repercussions. It was crucial to put forward Turkey’s arguments in a newspaper that is preferred by the U.S. middle class and Trump voters and one of the most agenda-setting outlets in the U.S.

Berat Albayrak, the minister of Treasury and Finance, has done a similar thing by establishing one-to-one relations with investors and with his political addresses in France and the U.K.Serdar Kılıç, Turkey’s Ambassador to the U.S., has also written articles in newspapers closely followed by international decision-makers, such as The Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post, greatly influencing Western public opinion.

All this shows that a more active position has been taken up against the deep perception operations run against Turkey and its president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. This is spearheaded by the communications department led by Fahrettin Altun, which has been established under the Presidency following the transition to the new system.

In short, we see that Turkey has been implementing more efficient public relations, public diplomacy and lobbying management after the transition to the presidential system. Unlike before, lobbying activities are no longer transferred to others.

Still, the troubles are not over yet. Washington is the most important decisive city that creates the perception of world public opinion. There are still serious problems here. The Israeli lobby, the Armenian diaspora, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and the Gülenist Terror Group (FETÖ) have all been running a contemptible smear campaign against Turkey for years.

Against this campaign, Turkey should tell its extremely accurate and correct theses in an effective way in the U.S. Public institutions are making a serious effort, but others, especially the business world, should also shoulder responsibility.

We need perception management not only in times of crisis but on a constant basis as well. Our big companies should put the opportunities they have in place to use in favor of our country. In conclusion, we have significant opportunities to mitigate the crisis and these should be seized.


Please follow and like us:


  • The Rising influence of Chinese Social Media 16th Jan 2019 image from article source: People Can Say ‘No’: The Rising influence of Chinese Social Media It is worth noting that with the wider use of internet and social media, the social media and its users obtain stronger influence in China, both domestically and internationally. The Chinese social media users, especially the young generation […]
  • Metzgar paper published by USC Center on Public Diplomacy 16th Jan 2019 Associate professor Emily Metzgar (Maggie Richards | The Media School) A paper by associate professor Emily Metzgar published by the USC Center on Public diplomacy [JB emphasis] analyzes the United States’ seven-decade history of government-sponsored international broadcasting.“Seventy Years of the Smith-Mundt Act and U.S. International Broadcasting: Back to the Future?” finds that while the […]
  • The ‘dark side’ of digital diplomacy: countering disinformation and propaganda 16th Jan 2019 image (not from article) from Corneliu Bjola | Head of the Oxford Digital Diplomacy Research Group (#DigDiploROx) | @CBjola Excerpt: Theme The ‘dark side’ of digital diplomacy, that is, the strategic use of digital technologies as tools to counter disinformation and propaganda by governments and non-state actors has exploded in the recent years thus […]
  • State Department’s Integrated Country Strategy for Greece published 16th Jan 2019
    E.Tsiliopoulos, uncaptioned image from entry The State Department’s Integrated Country Strategy (ICS) for Greece recognizing the country’s position in the Eastern Mediterranean as being of key importance to US national security and energy priorities. Excerpt: Below is the full report: ... To combat attempts to destabilize the region, Mission Greece will support democratic institutions, […]
  • A Year in Review: Azerbaijan Optimizes Its Balanced Foreign Policy in 2018 16th Jan 2019
    Rahim Rahimov,, January 15, 2019 Image (not from article) fromExcerpt: Russia has pursued its own active official and public diplomacy [JB emphasis] with Azerbaijan. Bilateral relations seem to be warming significantly, with the two countries’ presidents having met six times in 2018, including two official reciprocal visits (see EDM September 18, October 24, 2018). […]

RSS Diplo Portal Belgrade

Most Viewed Posts

  • Twitter Suspends Hamas Accounts (967)
    By ROBERT MACKEYLast Updated, Sunday, Jan. 19 | Several Twitter accounts used by the military wing of Hamas have been suspended by the social network in recent days, angering the Islamist militants and delighting Israel’s military. #Twitter has suspended the official account of #Hamas, a terrorist group that uses social media to threaten #Israel
  • Brain drain in Serbia today (271)
    How does the Serbian government cope with the problem of brain drain today? The latest OECD publication, SOPEMI 2014 shows that 39 thousand persons emigrated in 2012 from Serbia to OECD countries only. (At the beginning of the global economic and financial crisis, the emigration from Serbia to OECD countries amounted to 27,000 in 2008.)
  • Humanitarian Intervention: Advantages and Disadvantages in East Timor and Kosovo (262)
    Have There Been Occasions on Which the Advantages of Humanitarian Intervention Using Armed Force have Outweighed the Disadvantages? Humanitarian intervention can be defined as the attempts of a foreign state to prevent violations of human rights in another state, often through the use of armed force. The use of armed force to protect human rights,

How Belgrade based diplomats use Digital Diplomacy and Internet 2016

Diplo Portal Belgrade

Please follow and like us:
Scroll Up

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)